Apr
12
2009
0

Can police seize your camera?

The issue of whether the police have the right to seize your camera is an increasing concern. Canadians were reminded of this last week when a camera belonging to a photographer for The Province was confiscated by Vancouver police.

Jason Payne said that police kept his camera for more than an hour before returning it.

“The gist of it is they were going to seize my camera as evidence in this situation, and that if I didn’t give it up I would be arrested and charged with obstructing justice,” Payne told CBC News.

Mack Pettigrew, a sergeant with the Ontario Provincial Police Department, runs a blog called “A Cop’s View”. In this recent post, he says that the police do not have the right to take your camera equipment or film.

In most cases if you ask someone for their help and request the camera or memory card they will hand it over but it does have to be returned. If the person refuses and does not give their name and starts taking off down the street then it is thought that this is evidence and can be legally taken before a judge with the explanation that there was no time to get a search warrant.

The rationale is simply if the police officers know who you are and where to find you, they can get the necessary paperwork (and approval) from the courts to seize the film (or data). Vancouver police spokeswoman Jana McGuinness echoed this viewpoint, that they do not make it a practice of taking reporters’ cameras because they know where to find them later.

The B.C. Civil Liberties Association’s executive director David Eby said his group will file a complaint against the department following the incident in Vancouver.

“In our opinion, there are only three circumstances where police can seize a camera: One is if a person consents to the seizure; one is if they have an order from a judge; and one is if they are taking the camera in a search incidental to an arrest — if they are arresting someone with a camera, and they are taking that camera from a person during the arrest process.”

Pettigrew agrees, and puts it quite reasonably and I encourage you to check out his blog.

Officers must be sure of their powers, you can not just go and take a camera from someone because they are going to put the video on youtube or sell it to the media.

I was listening to the so called experts on the radio show and found it interesting how they talked about how officers are uncomfortable with the knowledge that their actions are being video taped or pictures taken of them. I for one have no problem with this as it works both ways. We use video tape evidence all the time and as long as you doing your job professionally out on the streets then officers have nothing to fear.

Unfortunately we are human and have lapses in judgement at times and these seem to get caught on video and plastered all over the internet and media. One bad action can paint a bad picture for all of us. So be aware be professional and as a police officer know your powers when it comes to photos and video.

Both sides need to understand their respective powers. There are people – in all professions, on all sides – who go about dealing with situations like this in a very heavy handed way which only creates a greater division in the relationship of co-operation and trust.

I have many friends who work in media and unfortunately because enough police officers have tried to deal with them in a heavy handed way, often with a vague explanation that “it’s against the law” (it isn’t) that many of these people in the media don’t trust the police and that bias is obvious in their reporting, which in turn affects the image of the police to the public at large.

It’s not just a worrisome trend, it’s a cycle that can be prevented if photographers respect a crime scene just as police officers know the limitations of their duty.

Co-operation is a two way street.

Written by Alex Reid in: Intellectual Property, Law, Media, Sci/Tech, Video |
Apr
07
2009
0

Web Trend Map 4

Information Architects released its annual Web Trend Map.

The map illustrates the connections between the 333 most influential Web domains and the 111 most influential power players onto the Tokyo Metro map, based on revenue, traffic, popularity and other key metrics.

Written by Alex Reid in: Communication, Consumerism, Internet, Sci/Tech, Social Media |
Nov
04
2008
0

e-lection 2008

There is no doubt the American Presidential election is the most historic since perhaps the Kennedy/Nixon race. It’s the election that will see America’s first black President or America’s first female Vice President. Both candidates are Senators and are neither are incumbent to the office they are running for.

It’s also historic because finally the Internet has evolved – including the public in the democratic process with creativity and interactivity – from the debates to the vote.

YouTube has been on top of the game by partnering with the cable networks to give the microphone to the public allowing them to ask questions to the Presidential candidates. Even now on election day they are highlighting videos from people as or after they vote looking for any problems voters experience.

The instantaneous Twitter was utilized by Current TV when they fused spontaneous Twitter reactions with the broadcast of the first US Presidential Debate. Here’s what it looked like:

(VIDEO REMOVED)

Twitter even produced a keyword graph tallying up the response language. CBC News used Twitter a couple weeks ago using PowerPoint (groan) the CBC reporter pointed out Twitter keywords as the election wore on. Not live reporting, just a gathering of the past on.. PowerPoint? It was truly sad to watch.

Even the email address to contact CBC was confusing (ormistononline@) as the CBC named the contact after the presenter Susan Ormiston. Why not keep it simple and consistent like elections@cbc.ca?

Witnessing the CBC’s use pale use of technology (and/or lack of creativity) got under my skin. What the Americans have done in the run-up to their federal election is what we should be doing for our civic, provincial and federal elections.

Jun
09
2008
0

Petaflop computer reached

IBM and Los Alamos National Laboratory have built the world’s first petaflop machine. A petaflop is equal to one thousand trillion calculations per second.

The supercomputer, called Roadrunner, is designed to run “complex nuclear weapons calculations“. IBM says such a computer could also be used by the pharmaceutical industry to simulate the effect of drugs on the human body, or by Wall Street to simulate the impact of events on the stock market.

Roadrunner cost about $100 million and combines 6,948 dual-core AMD Opteron chips and 12,960 Cell engines, all housed in IBM blade servers. Eighty terabytes of memory are kept in 288 “refrigerator-sized” racks occupying 6,000 square feet. It was loaded onto 21 tractor trailer trucks from New York to Los Alamos and weighs 500,000 pounds.

It has 10,000 Infiniband and Gigabit Ethernet connections requiring 57 miles of fiber optic cable. Roadrunner uses open source Linux software from Red Hat and is more efficient than most supercomputers, delivering 376 million calculations per watt, according to IBM.

Written by Alex Reid in: Internet, Sci/Tech |
May
20
2008
0

PEI scraps alternative energy loan program

The CBC reports that the provincial Liberals in PEI (the majority) quietly scrapped its alternative energy efficiency loan program two months after it was introduced.

Written by Alex Reid in: Energy, Politics, Sci/Tech |

Alex Reid lives in Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada